it wahs | from inside the mind of krix at April 28, 2004 08:52 AM .
VIRGO (Aug. 23-Sept. 22): The influential New York Times Book Review may soon begin to emphasize nonfiction books and cut back on its coverage of literary fiction. "The most compelling ideas tend to be in the nonfiction world," Times executive editor Bill Keller said in an interview, launching the rumors. Poet Lawrence Ferlinghetti decried such a move, telling the San Francisco Chronicle's Heidi Benson that "the national consciousness has [already] been taken over by the technological and pragmatic." He'd like to see more fiction and poetry. Regardless of where you might stand on this issue for the long haul, Virgo, it's important to side with Ferlinghetti for now. You need less knowledge and more imagination, fewer of the hard facts and more of the dreamy truths.
*siding with Ferlinghetti...for now*
OT:
Krix...I've sent you email too, it's not coming back so I don't think you are spam blocked Mikey...can you check for us though Krix?
I haven't received any mail from you shelz, except for your reply about something a few days ago.
I've re-sent my reply to Mikey as well.
Posted by: krix on April 28, 2004 10:41 AMDreamy photo to go with the dreamy truths. :) *heads over to look at own horoscope*
Posted by: sta-cie on April 28, 2004 10:46 AMI could certainly do with more of his 'dreamy truth'.
I know, I'm greedy...
Posted by: Keanuette on April 28, 2004 11:34 AMHe is indeed poetry. He's also dreamy. :D
Posted by: Zen on April 28, 2004 11:48 AM....can hardly post for scrolling back up to look at that picture.... ooooohhhh
thank you
Posted by: Tawny on April 28, 2004 11:51 AMUmm...dreamy....
*thud*
Thanks for this sweet pic + text, krix, must join sta-cie in checking out my own 'scope.
Posted by: bakednudel on April 28, 2004 01:24 PM*drops work for like a hot rock in trade for "lavish self-fulfillment"*
Posted by: shelz on April 28, 2004 02:32 PMdreamy (uuuummm!) truth . . .
yeah....
:)
Honesty Anyway!
::swoon::
This is one of my favorite pictures ever. It looks like a painting :-) Rembrandt couldn't have done it better! :-D
This is probably the only one I'd consider framing and hanging up on my wall, fiercely claiming that it's 'art' rather then a giggling-girlie-fan pic, LOL!
Posted by: Julie! on April 28, 2004 04:16 PMOh, and I just thought of this: I DID get your email yesterday, Krix :-)
I just don't know if you got my reply! But as I wrote, it wasn't really a reply that you needed to reply to, LOL!
I hope that helped in solving the riddle. :-) Feel free to delete this comment, I'm just trying to get into the email-loop here ;-D
Off to look at the picture some more :-)
Posted by: Julie! on April 28, 2004 04:23 PM*lost in dreamy "truth"*
...yeah, it does look like an "art" photo, but I can accept it as a giggling-girlie-fan girl pic! ;-)
Posted by: shelz on April 29, 2004 06:44 AMGod, I love baby pictures....
Posted by: Smit too on April 29, 2004 06:46 AM